Feb 222018
Featured

Significance Of Valuation Solicitors

It rejected counter complaints by Mr. Crofton, backing claims that he had presented ‘untrue and fabricated’ evidence at a crucial stage in the issue. Sir Herman Ouseley, Chairman of the CRE, said the case raised serious questions about the ability of Hackney Council and it’s declared commitment to deliver real racial equality outcomes.

He also had Mr. Yeboah’s name put on a list of suspects sent to the registered property valuers melbourne for investigation while a member of a special tenancy investigation group that he managed made inquiries about his immigration status. When you are considering for taking the help of a conveyancing attorney and naming him over the web, you have to check his credibility Real Estate Valuation.

The case shows once again that no one can be complacent and even those organizations with designer label equality policies must change policies and practices while monitoring outcomes if equality is to become a reality,’ Sir Herman Ouseley. I am enormously relieved that the four-year nightmare to which I was subjected by Mr. Crofton and Hackney Council is finally coming to an end.

I hope that the Council will recognize the enormity of the Tribunal’s findings and take urgent and effective measures to ensure that no other employee of their’s is ever put through the horrendous ordeal to which I was subjected on the ground of his or her race, color, nationality or ethnic origin.

It accepted five of Mr. Yeboah’s complaints and rejected Mr. Crofton’s. The Tribunal has been concerned from time to time throughout the hearing that Mr. Crofton has misquoted from documents or misdescribed them or their significance. It is apparent that a high degree of mistrust is provoked in Mr. Crofton whenever people of African, particularly West African, origin are involved.

Mr. Crofton conducted a campaign designed to undermine the belief of others, particularly his employers, the Council, in Mr. Yeboah’s integrity and that he would not have treated Mr. Yeboah this way but for Mr. Yeboah’s race.
The Chief Executive for much of the period concerned, Jerry White, told the Tribunal that the treatment of Mr. Yeboah by Mr. Crofton was ‘the most serious case of harassment of a senior colleague that he had ever encountered in 13 years of senior management in local government’.

Feb 092018
Featured

How property valuation deals with buying and selling of houses?

property valuers brisbane is over a year since the 1999 draft of PPG13 was issued, and many months since the consultation period ended. We believe the whole of the development planning ‘industry’ is concerned that the position must be clarified, and local authorities put in a position where they can give consistent advice to prospective developers.


During the summer of 2000, Symonds issued a questionnaire to each English local planning authority, in similar fashion to the 1998 survey. About 60% of authorities replied and, whilst it is disappointing that so many could not find time to respond, Symonds and the BPF are grateful to those who did. However, for ease of reference the Figures in Appendix A show the data on maximum parking standards diagrammatically.

Figures 1 and 3 show results from the 1998 survey, whilst Figures 2 and 4, show in similar fashion, the results from the current survey. Responses on the maximum parking standards used by planning authorities show that 75% have current maximum B1 parking ratios of more than 1:35, i.e. from 1:15 upwards.

That suggests many planning authorities have yet to amend their standards in line with emerging planning guidance – perhaps not surprising given that the PPG 13 1999 consultation draft figure of 1:35 maximum has not yet been confirmed. The year 2000 survey has shown that 52% of planning authorities have a maximum B1 parking ratio of 1:25 or more, i.e. from 1:15 upwards.

That compares with 60% in the 1998 survey, and could indicate that both the emerging policy figure, and the general policy thrust to reduce parking, are being taken into account. However, given the small difference in the two figures, and the reduced sample size in the year 2000 survey, it difficult to draw too positive a conclusion on that. 75% of responses indicated that standards are under review, whereas in the 1998 survey only 48% of authorities were in the process of doing so.